Old-style security testing is slow, manual, expensive, and out of date the moment you ship. We rebuilt it around automation and AI: our tooling does the heavy lifting — scanning, exploring, and re-testing on every release — while our experts direct it and sign off the result. You get faster answers, continuous coverage, and a defensible posture your bank or regulator will accept — for a fraction of the price, and it stays true after launch.
Why the old model costs too much
A traditional penetration test is a team of expensive consultants, several weeks, and a PDF that is accurate the day it lands and silently wrong by your next deployment. Every re-test is another full-price engagement. For a fast-moving product, that is both too slow and too expensive to repeat — so most teams test once, at launch, and hope.
We took the opposite approach. Automation and AI carry the breadth and the repetition; senior expertise is spent only where it genuinely moves the needle — on judgement, validation and sign-off. That is what makes the service faster, continuous, and dramatically cheaper to run over time.
What we do
An end-to-end assurance engagement — automation-first, delivered as modules you can take together or in parts.
1 · Automated scanning & recon
The full breadth layer — attack-surface mapping, vulnerability scanning, code, dependency and secret analysis — orchestrated from one scope-controlled command into the dashboard.
2 · AI-assisted testing
AI agents explore the application and platform for the flaws automation usually misses — broken access control, authentication bypass, business-logic abuse, tenant isolation on shared platforms — with an expert steering and confirming.
3 · Automated compliance mapping
GDPR, DORA, PCI DSS and sector licensing, assessed with the discipline of a qualified assessor and accelerated with AI so the launch blockers surface early — while there is still time to act.
4 · Continuous assurance
The differentiator. Every confirmed finding becomes an automated, re-runnable check wired into your deployment pipeline, re-proving your security invariants on every release and showing them on a live green/red dashboard. A change that quietly reopens a hole turns a check red — before it reaches production.
5 · Independent verification & sign-off
Every finding is validated, evidenced, mapped to a recognised standard, and signed off by name. That is the accountable evidence your counterparties actually want — and the part no automation replaces.
How an engagement runs
- Scope & authorise — a tightly-bounded scope and written testing authorisation; testing only ever runs against an isolated, synthetic-data environment.
- Run the automated pipeline — scanning, code analysis and AI-assisted testing, from one command into the dashboard, in hours.
- Validate & report — experts remove false positives, rate every finding, and AI helps assemble one clear, evidence-backed report with an honest coverage statement — in days, not weeks.
- Assure continuously — the harness and dashboard stay in place and re-run on every release, so the result keeps proving itself.
What it costs you (and what it saves)
- Less than a traditional pentest for the initial assessment — same rigour, far less manual labour.
- A fraction of that, ongoing, for continuous assurance — priced as a subscription, not a series of full re-tests.
- Fewer expensive surprises late — because a regression is caught on the deploy that caused it, not in next year’s audit.
What you get
A combined security and compliance report with a defensible coverage statement; a validated findings register with remediation guidance; a compliance-readiness position with the launch blockers named; and a continuous-assurance harness and live dashboard you keep — so the result holds after we leave.
Who it is for
Fintechs, lenders and insurers approaching launch; SaaS and platform businesses handling financial or sensitive personal data; and any team facing bank, insurer or regulator due diligence — especially fast-shipping teams on serverless, BaaS or multi-tenant infrastructure who cannot afford to test only once.